Category Archives: Google

Google Launches “Free The Airwaves”

Google’s been chomping at the bit over “white space,” which is unused spectrum that resides next to broadcast TV spectrum, for some time now. On Monday it, announced the launch of Free the Airwaves, a site promoting the unlicensed use of “white space” spectrum.

While definitely not altruistic, it certainly sells itself as such, saying its aim is to “Bring wireless Internet to everyone, everywhere.”

In their blog post announcing the site, Google said:

For quite some time we’ve been talking about the potential of the unused airwaves between broadcast TV channels (”white spaces”) to provide affordable, high-speed wireless Internet connectivity nationwide. For this to happen, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) must allow unlicensed use of this spectrum.

If you care about the future of the Internet, now is the time to take action. The FCC has completed its field testing and is expected to make a ruling in the coming months. With this in mind, today we’re launching Free The Airwaves, a new effort to bring users together around this important issue.

At its core, Free The Airwaves is a call to action for everyday users. You don’t need to be a telecommunications expert to understand that freeing the “white spaces” has the potential to transform wireless Internet as we know it. When you visit the site, you’ll be invited to film a video response explaining what increased Internet access could mean for you, to sign a petition to the FCC, to contact your elected officials, to spread the word, and more.

The site has a number of video testimonials on the subject of “white space,” including Matthew Rantanen of Tribal Digital Village, Wally Bowen of the Mountain Area Information Network, and others.

But, as I said, it’s not altruistic. In March, in an ex parte filing with the FCC (.PDF), Google’s Washington-based counsel Richard Whitt advised commissioners that the abundance of unused airspace could provide “a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to provide ubiquitous wireless broadband access to all Americans.”

But he also went on to cite how it could help Google’s bid to launch services on Android phones:

“Coupled with the ‘Android’ open source platform for mobile consumer devices, TV white spaces can provide uniquely low-cost mobile broadband coverage for all Americans. As announced last fall, over thirty other companies are working with Google through the Open Handset Alliance to develop a fully open source software stack, including the operating system, middleware, and user applications. Android-powered handsets should begin appearing commercially later this year, and would be an excellent match for the TV white space.”

It may be a little too early to tell if this is all technically feasible. If this is to work, “white space devices”must be able to detect when designated frequencies are in use by other transmitters, and then shift their own frequencies. We know how well that works on wireless-n routers which are supposed to shift frequencies to prevent “bad neighbor” behavior.

We already have enough problems just making 3G work, whether it’s on the iPhone or not; many believe trying to sneak into the unused spaces in the spectrum is just asking for trouble.

The FCC is expected to announce its test findings next month.

Google’s Android, the HTC Dream, Receives FCC Approval

The rumored Sept.17th announcement of the HTC Dream (AKA gPhone or G1, or whatever) keeps getting more and more solid, as the new device has received FCC approval.

As we previously wrote, the first carrier to get their hands on this phone, which is supposedly the only Android phone to arrive in 2008, will be T-Mobile.

FCC paperwork is here.

You can’t tell much based on these documents, but it seems that the HTC Dream will have wi-fi and Bluetooth (not that anything would launch without BT nowadays). Navigation apparently will be handled by a jogball, as was noted in the prior video.

Start checking the state of your mobile contract, if you’re considering jumping to T-Mobile for this.

Google’s Android to Launch Sept. 17th?

A story about a cell phone, and it’s not the iPhone? Well, as I said before, if anything can cause people to write about a different cell phone, it’s Android. When a relatively small, unofficial T-Mobile blog like TMONews writes about a possible launch, that’s one thing, but when the New York Times confirms it, that’s another.

The phone, alternatively called the HTC Dream or the G1, is a touch-screen device with a slider keyboard. There’s even been a video supposedly of it leaked (below). It should be noted that the NY Times had a source confirm that the video appears to be the real deal.

The rumored price: $150 for the first week only — and only for current T-Mobile subscribers. After that, the price will rise to between $250 and $400. This is a strange pricing arrangement, but it smacks of what happens when something is exclusive, and projected to be a hot seller.

The Dream is supposedly the only Android device that will launch this year. The good thing for T-Mobile is that since it’s 3G network is undeveloped (only Las Vegas and New York expect to have full T-Mobile 3G networks at launch), it won’t be hearing complaints about 3G coverage as Apple has.

Watch the video:

Google’s Search Market Share Tops 70%

… but they’re still not a monopoly, at least if you ask the company. On Monday researchers at market research firm Hitwise released their monthly search share report, and their data indicates that Google has now topped 70% in terms of search market share.

Google reached a new milestone and accounted for 70.77 percent of all U.S. searches. Google’s share of searches increased 10% over the same month last year and 2% over the previous month. Yahoo! Search, MSN Search (including Live.com), and Ask followed with 18.65%, 5.36%, and 3.53% share of searches, respectively.

That’s Google’s tenth consecutive record high in monthly search share.

And if you wonder why Microsoft is / was so keen on snagging Yahoo!’s search technology — and thus its users — MSN Search (which includes Live Search) has felt a lot of pain: it accounted for just 5.36% of U.S. Internet search in July. Last year Microsoft had 8.79%. Whoops.

But still, really, Google’s not a monopoly, right?

Gmail Outage Shows “The Cloud” Still Has a Slightly Tarnished Lining

Don’t get me wrong, the idea of “cloud computing” is great. It’s just that you’re depending on the service, and access to it via the Internet, to be available, 24×7. Based on the outages of late, the current state of the technology seems to point to having to have a backup plan, just in case.

And that’s ironic, since one of the uses of the cloud is automated backups of your data.

Yesterday’s Gmail outage is just the latest in a series of incidents that don’t inspire confidence. In their apology, Google said:

We feel your pain, and we’re sorry

Many of you had trouble accessing Gmail for a couple of hours this afternoon, and we’re really sorry. The issue was caused by a temporary outage in our contacts system that was preventing Gmail from loading properly. Everything should be back to normal by the time you read this.

We heard loud and clear today how much people care about their Gmail accounts. We followed all the emails to our support team and user group, we fielded phone calls from Google Apps customers and friends, and we saw the many Twitter posts. (We also heard from plenty of Googlers, who use Gmail for company email.) We never take for granted the commitment we’ve made to running an email service that you can count on.

Other issues of late:

  • Google Apps’ downtime last week.
  • Nick Saber’s highly publicized downtime (and he was a paying user).
  • MobileMe’s fiascoes (MobileMe email went down again yesterday, in fact, after being called stable)
  • Amazon S3’s outages (including another in July)

As I said, it’s not that I don’t love the cloud. In fact, some of the data I access daily exists there, in the form of Google Docs spreadsheets. But this latest stumble does show that if companies as large as Amazon.com and Google can’t keep their cloud services up and running, then they’d darn well better add some sort of local redundancy that users can utilize (e.g., some sort of desktop synching).

And one thing people frequently forget: it’s not just the service provider you have to worry about. Just last week Comcast had an outage in my area. Sure, I could hop offer to the local coffee shop for some free wi-fi (assuming they were on AT&T DSL and not Comcast), but that’s just another weak link in the chain.

Much as I hate to admit it, there’s no way I’d trust putting everything in the cloud, not just yet.